##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Lucian Brihacescu

Abstract

The first part of the article describes the context and reasons that generated the Archigram movement as well as its main principles and projects. The second part follows  the impact it had, on visual arts and on the mentality of the generations that followed, as well as on the new context that makes sort of possible, usable and effective some of the radical avant-garde concepts proposed by the group.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite

Brihacescu , L. (2019). Plastic. Journal of Architecture, Urbanism and Heritage, 2(2). Retrieved from http://jauh.upt.ro/index.php/JAUH/article/view/26

References

[1] Steiner, Hadas Anna. Bathrooms, bubbles and systems: Archigram and the landscapes of transience. Diss. Massachusetts Institute of Technology,
[2] Banham, Reyner: Zoom wave hits architecture.
New society3.21 (1966): 1965-1973.
[3] Cook, Peter, Plug-in City Study, 1964.
Courtesy of Archigram Archives.
[4]Lewallen, Constance, Steve Seid, and Chip Lord. Ant Farm, 1968-1978. Univ of California Press, 2004.
[5] Bruno Yuen, Wong Kin. "On the Edge of Spaces:" Blade Runner"," Ghost in the Shell", and Hong Kong's Cityscape." Science Fiction Studies (2000):1-21
[6] Gibson, W. (1984), Neuromancer, Ace Books, New York NY.
[7] Mazur, Dan, and Alexander Danner. Comics: A global history, 1968 to the present. London: Thames & Hudson, 2014.
[8] Brass, C., Bright, A., Scott, C., & Rayner, A. Chicken Run.
[9] Marchese, Andrew D., Cagdas D. Onal, and Daniela Rus. "Autonomous soft robotic fish capable of escape maneuvers using fluidic elastomer actuators." Soft Robotics 1.1 (2014): 75-87.